When he weighs more than how many when assessing a couple

The sexual history of a possible couple provides important information that can be used to minimize the risks of that possible union in the future. This has been thought about researchers at the University of Swansea in the United Kingdom who wanted to discover How the number of previous couples affects a suitor to the long -term couple and his sexual encounters on the temporal line.

Thus, this international study has discovered that, when choosing a long -term couple, people around the world, regardless of whether they are men or women, Not only takes into account how many sexual partners someone has had, but also when Those meetings took place.

This is the first time that researchers have explored the moment of sexual history along with quantity, which offers A new perspective on human mating psychology.

The study survey more than 5,000 participants from 11 countries Of the five continents. He discovered that, in general, people were less willing to commit to someone with many previous sexual partners, but they were more open if those encounters had become less frequent over time, which suggests a departure from casual sex.

“People use sexual history as a signal to evaluate the risk in a relationship. In our ancestors, knowing the sexual history of someone could help avoid risks such as STIs, infidelity, emotional instability or rivalry with ex -partners,” says the doctor Andrew G. Thomasprincipal researcher at the Faculty of Psychology at Swansea University.

Previous studies have shown that people, in general, are less prone to establish relationships with people who have had many sexual partners in the past. However, the particularly interesting thing about the findings of this study is that this effect decreases when these meetings occurred mainly in the past, something we have observed worldwide.

Participants were shown simple visual schedules that represented the sexual history of a possible couple. Each chronology showed the same number of previous couples, but with different patterns: some concentrated in childhood, others were distributed evenly and some decreased over time.

The participants They evaluated their willingness to seek a serious relationshiprevealing that the moment of previous encounters, particularly if sexual activity with new couples had decreased over time, significantly influenced their perceptions.

Posted in Scientific Reports, The study found little evidence of a sexual double moralsince the male and female participants evaluated their sexual history in a similar way. Only small gender differences between countries and cultures were observed.

“The results of this study indicate the absence of double sexual standards, which challenges the idea that women are judged more severity for their sexual past than men,” says the researcher.

The study also analyzed how people’s attitudes towards casual sex influenced their opinions. Those who were more open to casual relationships were less affected by their partner’s sexual history, although they continued to show some sensitivity in this regard.

“Online speech on people’s sexual history can be very convicted, but The results of this study reveal that the panorama is much more nuanced. They have made us believe that society strongly judges those who have a sexually adventurous past, but, as individuals, people are, in fact, much more indulgent, especially if their approach to sex has changed. “

The results of this study not only shed light on the universal nature of our sexual psychology, but They could also be used to combat the misogynist debate about sexual history online. However, the study concludes that “the evaluation of sexual history does not focus simply on who either thatbut in considering as, because and when.